Preview
CLINTON CO. COMMON PLEAS COURT 46 S. South St., Suite 333, Wilmington, OH 45177Plaintiff(s) SUMMONSMidfirst Bank999 Nw Grand BoulevardOklahoma City Ok 73118 CASE#: CVE 20240250 RULE (4)Defendant(s)The United States Of America,221 East Fourth StreetCincinnati Oh 45202 * * * * * * * * * * * * *To the above named defendant(s): You are hereby summoned that a complaint (copy of which ishereto attached and made a part hereof) has been filed against youin this court by the plaintiff(s) named herein. You are required to serve upon the plaintiff's attorney,or upon the plaintiff if (he/she) has no attorney of record, a copyof your answer to the complaint within twenty-eight (28) days afterthe service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the date ofservice. Your answer must be filed with this Court within three (3)days after service of a copy of the answer on the plaintiff's attorney. The name and address of the plaintiff's attorney is as follows: Angela D. Kirk, Esq. Manley Deas Kochalski Llc Po Box 165028 Columbus, Oh 43216-5028 (614) 220-5611 If you fail to appear and defend, judgment by default will betaken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. CYNTHIA R. BAILEY Clerk of Courts Aug 27, 2024 Tanya West Deputy Clerk CLINTON CO. COMMON PLEAS COURT 46 S. South St., Suite 333, Wilmington, OH 45177Plaintiff(s) SUMMONSMidfirst Bank999 Nw Grand BoulevardOklahoma City Ok 73118 CASE#: CVE 20240250 RULE (4)Defendant(s)Citibank, National Association4400 Easton Commons WayColumbus Oh 43219 * * * * * * * * * * * * *To the above named defendant(s): You are hereby summoned that complaint of which is a (copyhereto attached and made a part hereof) has been filed against youin this court by the plaintiff(s) named herein. You are required to serve upon the plaintiff's attorney,or upon the plaintiff if (he/she) has no attorney of record, a copyof your answer to the complaint within twenty-eight (28) after daysthe service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the date ofservice. Your answer must be filed with this Court within three (3)days after service of a copy of the answer on the plaintiff's attorney. The name and address of the plaintiff's attorney is as follows: Angela D. Kirk, Esq. Manley Deas Kochalski Llc Po Box 165028 Columbus, Oh 43216-5028 (614) 220-5611 If you fail to appear and defend, judgment by default will betaken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. CYNTHIA R. BAILEY Clerk of Courts Aug 27, 2024 Tanya West Deputy Clerk CLINTON CO. COMMON PLEAS COURT 46 S. South St., Suite 333, Wilmington, OH 45177Plaintiff(s) SUMMONSMidfirst Bank999 Nw Grand BoulevardOklahoma City Ok 73118 CASE#: CVE 20240250 RULE (4)Defendant(s)The United States Of AmericaSecretary Of Housing & Urban950 Pennsylvania AvenueWashington, Dc 20530 * * * * * * * * * * * * *To the above named defendant(s): You are hereby summoned that complaint of which is a (copyhereto attached and made a part hereof) has been filed against youin this court by the plaintiff(s) named herein. You are required to serve the plaintiff's upon attorney,or upon the plaintiff if (he/she) has no attorney of record, a copyof answer to the complaint within (28) your twenty-eight days afterthe service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the date ofservice. Your answer must be filed with this Court within three (3)days after service of a copy of the answer on the plaintiff's attorney. The name and address of the plaintiff's is follows: attorney as Angela D. Kirk, Esq. Manley Deas Kochalski Llc Po Box 165028 Columbus, Oh 43216-5028 (614) 220-5611 If you fail to appear and defend, judgment by default will betaken against for the relief demanded in the you complaint. CYNTHIA R. BAILEY Clerk of Courts Aug 27, 2024
Related Contentin Clinton County
Case
Aug 16, 2024 |JWR |JL24300889
Case
Credit Acceptance Corp vs Floyd, Beverly
Nov 29, 2011 |JWR |JL21131433
Case
Aug 16, 2024 |JWR |JL24300886
Case
Ohio Department Of Taxation vs Bevan, Jessica L
Aug 16, 2024 |JWR |JL24300888
Case
Ohio Department Of Taxation vs Bic Auto Llc
Aug 16, 2024 |JWR |JL24300885
Case
Wright Patt Credit Union vs Bryant, Brian
Aug 29, 2024 |JWR |Other Civil |CV20240326
Case
Bank Of America Na vs Laskey, Bradley G
Aug 19, 2024 |JWR |JL24300891
Case
Bank Of America Na vs Laskey, Bradley G
Aug 19, 2024 |JWR |JL24300892
Case
Schneider National Carriers vs Humble Logistics Llc
Aug 22, 2024 |JWR |Personal Injury |CV20240319
Ruling
SYDNEY BAEK VS LASUPPORTIVEHOUSING, LLC
Aug 27, 2024 |24CMCV00508
Case Number: 24CMCV00508 Hearing Date: August 27, 2024 Dept: A 24CMCV00508 Sydney Baek v. LASUPPORTIVEHOUSING, LLC Tuesday, August 27, 2024 [TENTATIVE] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFAULT JUDGMENT I. BACKGROUND This action arises from Defendants alleged breach of a written lease agreement for four different parcels of residential real property. Plaintiff alleges $288,804 in damages for Defendants alleged failure to pay rent. The clerk entered defendant against Defendant, LA SupportiveHousing, LLC on June 16, 2024. Plaintiff does not allege sufficient facts to support the foundation or authenticity of the business records submitted. The complaint alleges principal damages of $288,804.00. (Complaint 4:18-19.) However, Plaintiffs Damage History Note shows principal damages for unpaid rent and repairs totaling $281,221.00. (Ex. 2, .pdf 16.) Plaintiff requests expenses for repair and cleaning totaling $55,183 (Baek decl., ¶ 19). However, the sum of all invoices is $46,483.00 (Baek Decl., Ex. 3.) Invoice 2007 11164 repair/replace and repair 9940 2/17/23 11164 1⁄2 repair/replace 9750 4/2/23 11166 repair/replace 9300 12/5/22 11166 1⁄2 repaint 10,000 2/16/23 11164 1⁄2 rekey 165 2/28/23 11164 1⁄2 install refrigerator/Stove 750 2/16/23 11164 1⁄2 security 1200 12/30/22 11164 security for 26 days 2500 5/12/22 Security 2600 3/22/23 11166 & 11166 1⁄2 new keys and locks 278 TOTAL 46,483 Additionally, Invoice # 2007 was submitted twice. While Plaintiff mentions recovery of attorney fees, there is no discussion of the basis for its calculation, nor is it separately accounted for in the proposed judgment (Baek decl., ¶ 21.) Costs of $635 are established. Plaintiff collected $10,000 for a security deposit. (Lease, Ex. 1, ¶ 4.A.) The landlord may recover reasonably necessary amounts to remedy tenant defaults in the payment of rent, to repair damages to the premises caused by the tenant, or to clean the premises upon termination of the tenancy, if the payment or deposit is made for any or all of those specific purposes." (Civ. Code, § 1950.5; (a); Civ. Code, § 1950.7(c).) Declarant Baek does not account for the security deposit and whether it was applied to the back rent, cleaning, or repairs. Accordingly, the hearing on Plaintiffs request for court judgment is continued for Plaintiff to submit a supplemental declaration supporting the submission of the business records, a calculation of damages supported by invoices and receipts, allocation of the security deposit, evidence to support principal damages and a re-calculation of principal damages, for back rent damages for repairs/cleaning. If attorneys fees were sought, Plaintiff is ordered to explain the basis for such fees, its calculation, and apply it separately in the proposed judgment where indicated. The hearing is continued to October 31, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. in Department A of the Compton Courthouse. Plaintiff is ordered to provide a supplemental declaration discussing the foregoing discrepancies at least 10 court days before the hearing.
Ruling
EAGLE CREEK RANCH VS. HOUSER, ET AL.
Aug 31, 2024 |CVCV21-0197760
EAGLE CREEK RANCH VS. HOUSER, ET AL.Case Number: CVCV21-0197760This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of dismissal. No Request for Dismissal has been filed. Noupdated information has been provided to the Court. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar toprovide the Court with a status of the case and the status of the dismissal.
Ruling
Sol Selection, LLC vs. All persons unknown
Aug 26, 2024 |23CV-0203591
SOL SELECTION, LLC VS. ALL PERSONS UNKNOWNCase Number: 23CV-0203591This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of default judgment. On June 5, 2024, thisCourt issued its Ruling after a June 3, 2024 Default Prove Up hearing. The Court denied therequest to enter default judgment without prejudice. Nothing further has been filed. Anappearance is necessary on today’s calendar to provide the Court with a status of defaultjudgment.
Ruling
NEELY vs DUNN, JR.
Sep 01, 2024 |CVSW2311070
DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT BY FIRSTCVSW2311070 NEELY VS DUNN, JR.AMERICAN TITLE COMPANYTentative Ruling: SUSTAN the unopposed demurrer without leave to amend. GRANTthe request for judicial notice.
Ruling
RISSMAN vs RISSMAN
Aug 31, 2024 |CVRI2202453
DEMURRER ON COMPLAINT FOROTHER REAL PROPERTY (OVERCVRI2202453 RISSMAN VS RISSMAN$25,000) OF HOWARD J RISSMAN BYMATTHEW RISSMANTentative Ruling: No tentative will be given. Counsel is required to appear and provide an updateto the court regarding the status of adding all necessary parties.5.DEMURRER ON COMPLAINT FORMEDICAL MALPRACTICE (OVERMCLAUGHLIN VS COUNTYCVRI2302520 $25,000) OF LINDA MCLAUGHLIN BYOF RIVERSIDEJOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES,INCTentative Ruling: The unopposed demurrer is sustained with 30 days leave to amend.
Ruling
- GRESIO, TINA vs MYERS, BEVERLY J
Aug 26, 2024 |CV-24-004770
CV-24-004770 - GRESIO, TINA vs MYERS, BEVERLY J - Plaintiff's Motion For Preliminary Injunction Prohibiting Eviction, Encumbrances,and Sale Of Property Ccp526(A)(1)-(4); 527(A) - CONTINUED, at the moving party’s request, to October 9, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 23.
Ruling
Sol Selection, LLC vs. All persons unknown
Aug 29, 2024 |23CV-0203590
SOL SELECTION, LLC VS. ALL PERSONS UNKNOWNCase Number: 23CV-0203590This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of default judgment. The Court notes that Plaintiff’s Requestto Enter Default Judgment was denied without prejudice on June 22, 2024. It appears that no further attemptshave been made to resolve the matter. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.
Ruling
ST. ANDREWS SECOND HOME LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SECOND HOME US INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, ET AL.
Aug 28, 2024 |23STCV09293
Case Number: 23STCV09293 Hearing Date: August 28, 2024 Dept: 52 No. 7 St. Andrews Second Home, LLC v. Second Home US Inc. 8/28/24 23STCV09293 Tentative Ruling The court has reviewed plaintiffs memorandum in support of its request for entry of default on its first amended complaint. The court finds that defendants Second Home US Inc. and Second Home Ltd. have been duly served with the first amended complaint. After both defendants made a general appearance, they were served by mail at the last known address they provided the court and plaintiff in their substitutions of attorney dated April 9, 2024. The court further finds that defendants have not timely responded to the first amended complaint. The general rule is that a plaintiff can obtain a default against a defendant who responded to a complaint but failed to timely respond to an amended complaint. (Code Civ. Proc., § 471.5.) But an exception to the rule applies, at least in part, in this case. [W]hen a complaint is amended after answer, the defendant is not bound to answer de novo. He may do so if he chooses; but, if he does not elect to do so, his original answer stands as his answer to the amended complaint; and in such case he will not be in default except as to the additional facts set up in the amended complaint, and not put in issue by the answer. (Carrasco v. Craft (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 796, 809.) Here, plaintiffs initial complaint sets forth a breach of contract cause of action against each defendant. Plaintiff alleged that defendants were liable for $585,468.89 in unpaid rent due as of March 8, 2023. The claim against defendant Second Home US Inc. was based on a written lease. The claim against Second Home Ltd. was based on a written guaranty. On these claims, a default cannot be taken against defendants. Turning to the first amended complaint, plaintiff must offer evidence to establish liability on its first and third causes of action because defendants are deemed to deny them, at least in part. But plaintiffs second cause of action for breach of contract is a new claim because it is based on defendant Second Home US Inc.s alleged failure to construct improvements, not its alleged failure to pay rent. Likewise, plaintiffs fourth cause of action for negligence, fifth cause of action for waste, sixth cause of action for breach of assignment, and seventh cause of action for conversion are wholly new claims that defendants have not denied. Plaintiff thus need not establish liability on those claims. Under Code of Civil Procedure section 585, the clerk shall enter the default of the defendant or defendants who has or have not timely responded to the operative complaint. (Code Civ. Proc., § 585, subds. (a)(b).) The statute does not provide for the entry of default against a defendant on a subset of the causes of action. In other words, whether the clerk enters default is a binary matter. Consistent with this binary choice, the courts electronic administrative system does not permit the clerk to enter default on selected causes of action. Either the defendant is in default, or the defendant is not in default. In these circ*mstances, the court shall not direct the clerk to enter default.
Document
Freedom Mortgage Corporation vs Wilkinson, Ann
Aug 07, 2024 |JWR |Foreclosure |CV20240296
Document
Clinton County Treasurer vs Purdin, Victor Clark
Sep 01, 2023 |JWR |Foreclosures |CV20230292
Document
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., As Tru vs Vincent, Rachel
Jul 31, 2024 |JWR |Foreclosure |CV20240290
Document
Clinton County Treasurer vs Purdin, Victor Clark
Sep 01, 2023 |JWR |Foreclosures |CV20230292
Document
First National Bank vs John Doe(S) Name Unknown, The
Nov 17, 2023 |JWR |Foreclosures |CV20230370
Document
Freedom Mortgage Corporation vs Wilkinson, Ann
Aug 07, 2024 |JWR |Foreclosure |CV20240296
Document
st Bancorp Mortgage vs Hensley, Patricia Irene
Aug 13, 2024 |JWR |Foreclosure |CV20240304
Document
Freedom Mortgage Corporation vs Wilkinson, Ann
Aug 07, 2024 |JWR |Foreclosure |CV20240296
